A Match Made in Hell

I’ve been taking a little time off to [try and] enjoy life, upgrade my computer so I can begin doing video projects, and research two [what I feel are] important upcoming articles: the real story behind the creation of the MPAA and the true meaning of Valentine’s Day. But, a new story came out this Sunday that I, despite trying, could not ignore: Condom maker seeks endorsement deal with Miley Cyrus.

I really can’t imagine this “deal” taking place. While Disney is not above subliminal (and superliminal) sexual messages, such an unholy alliance might actually lead to the average Disney brainwashed parent thinking: “Hm. Something about that doesn’t seem right.” Then again, I may be seriously overestimating them [the parents]. If any pile of shit properly marketed, under the [false] guise of protecting “the children,” the general public will swallow anything … any–thing.

Here’s Miley marketing toxic rGBH laden milk in the first picture (among other things, obviously) and I’m not sure exactly what in the second. I’m aware that many remain willfully ignorant of the the facts about milk. Spend just a little time researching the topic, and why anyone would drink something proven beyond doubt to cause cancer, and proven beyond doubt to contain 10% puss by volume [caused by effect of rGBH on cow’s teats] is beyond me. {*1} If you become aware of these facts, and then still give this stuff (regular rGBH-laden milk) to your children, then your problems lie outside the scope of what I will be discussing in this article.

Back to the condom thing, it looks like NY Daily News broke the story, and since, most variations [this was picked up by nearly every major outlet: suspicious] that have come out have borrowed from the source. Here’s an excerpt from the original with some comments [embedded in blue] from yours truly:

Miley Cyrus says she wants to be taken more seriously by an adult audience, but LifeStyles Condoms wants to harness Cyrus’ appeal to her younger audience … by encouraging tweens [¡agreed upon range is 10 to 12!] to embrace safe sex [¡ha!].

The prophylactic peddler [¿apropo monicker, no?] wants the 15-year-old singing sensation (who has professed that she will be a virgin [¿inside the family doesn’t count?] until she gets married) [never mind, just marketing for Christians] to be its new spokesperson and is willing to offer Cyrus $1 million [¿kind of low, no?] to shill its brand.

“Pop culture proves that teens are more ready than ever to discuss the subject of sex,” [yea, that’s cause they are more sexualized than any generation in modern history] said Carol Carrozza, [¿KK?] VP of marketing for LifeStyles. “With recent reports showing that one out of four teenage girls has an STD and the high level of teenage pregnancy, we believe that Miley is both influential [¡understatement!] and relatable to this afflicted set [¿odd choice of words?] – and is the obvious choice to get the message of safe sex out to teens across America.”

LifeStyles is also generously offering Miley a lifetime supply of condoms for “whenever she decides the time is right.” [¡where’s that damn air-sickness bag!]

I’d prefer this not feel like a homework assignment, but this article is is going to touch on topics I’ve covered in prior blogs, hence I’d recommend the following “101” articles. I’ll try to refer where possible, but consider these a must read for anyone unaware of the agendas at play here:

• If the Glove Doesn’t Fit (condoms, the safe sex scam)
• No More Secrets No More Lies (the hannah montana scam)
• Post-Subliminal Era Has Begun (subliminals and superliminals)
• Goddess of the Vulva (from madonna to britney to miley)

In case my regular readers are now wondering if they’re in for yet another angry rant, I’m going to [for the moment] say no. My anger was tempered by a comment I found attached to one of the aforementioned variations of this story. While I can’t surmise this person is fully aware of the truth about condoms, it is refreshing to see someone actually using their intuition:

“J” – A lifetime supply of LifeStyles is not an incentive. Those things are awful. I’m fairly sure the “lubricant” is rattlesnake venom, and they break like 60% of the time. If your lifestyle involves vaginal chafing and unplanned pregnancy, this is your brand.

In the meantime, Miley [or one of her handlers] has released yet another batch of salacious pictures. I’ve concluded these [now regular] “accidents” (like the main story herein) are tests, to see just how far Disney (and others) can push the envelope before the average parent wakes up: My guess? Pretty far!

The above, are actually not the latest pics in question. But, if I wrote an article every single time Miley decided to flash someone her panties, well then I might as well rename my blog and replace the new “warrior” header with a Hannah hearts and flowers collage. {*2} On top of that, I would then have to devote all my time responding to “hater” comments from her fan[atic]-base.

On second thought …. no. Worth a view, however, are just a few of the [unedited] comments found on one such saucy “exposition” site:

“J” – Hey, Leave her alone, People are so obsessed with disney stars these days..Hey if i had her Body, i would be doing it too.. & im 13. She is A Normal Girl who works for disney.. that shouldnt make her a bad rolemodel.. just a teen girl that likes to have fun

“T” – She’s a beautifull girl and she did not do anything wrong. These pictures after all were never intended for public use… It’s just because her ex bf posted then online… Let he who is without sin cast the first stone a wise man once said 😉 So stop messing about trying to ruin a wonderful actress and fantastic singer’s career!!!

“K” – Miley Cyrus is just like anybody else, she goes through rough patches and everybody needs to leave her ALONE!!! I like her and i am 12 so what! I L-O-V-E to sing and she is my insperation!!! I also have all of her CD’s!!!

Scary, no? As I previously stated, fan is a stem of fanatic which means “marked by excessive enthusiasm and often intense uncritical devotion.” Only one comment showed even a remote glimmer of independent thought, but at the end, just redirects the blame [falling into another Disney preprogrammed bucket]:

“J” – oh my goshhhhh! people are taking up for her! the pictures get worse, you know that right? but the part that bothers me the mostttttt is that she blamed nick. she tells everyone that nick was beggingggg for bad photos. but he knows better. i love the jonas brothers; hateeee miley cyrus and selena gomez. and not bc im obsessed. so i have a badddd case of OJD. [look into it] but ughhh. people these days.

A friend of mine is considering taking in a “troubled tween” relative who has been exemplifying what would have once been considered aberrant sexual behavior. I asked her if she knew what she was getting herself into, and what made her think this behavior was not the norm for girls her age today. Our conversation affirmed both to the negative. The influence of the media, arguably the primary factor in the molding of today’s youth, has made “parenting” obsolete in some cases, and for those who allow regular media access, a nearly hopeless endeavor.

Hence, Disney’s been given carte blanche to do as they wilt. As I’ve speculated before, the reasons for the responsibility “hand-off” is likely from a combination of “too busy working” (a stock answer from many parents I know) and the natural “goodness” [for lack of better words] in most people. In other words, they either are so repulsed by the concept, investigation of makes them feel “dirty,” or locked into a mode of “living in denial;” being unable to image they (they, as in the nebulous “other people” who would be looking out for your kids) would allow such a program to proceed unabated.

I’m sure the people at Tavistock figured all these factors out a long time before I surmised this, and rely on them to push their social engineering agendas. The devolution of mankind proceeds, exactly as the Huxleys and others told us it would, and ultimately, we have chosen to [and continue to] proceed down this [well-paved] road: “O brave new world: That hath such people in’t!”

As I pointed out above, here’s the [Jonas Bros] bucket the other lost tween fell into. Notice how Disney has taken over the entire list of idol [¿idle?] [“lacking worth or basis,” “a false conception,” or “an appearance without substance”] choices now? Frustratingly, another friend of mine, who has expressed concern over her daughter’s influences, limits her television exposure to only the Disney Channel? [Breathe in. Don’t get angry. OK.] Ever wonder what kind of adults these Disney kids are supposed to turn into? “O brave new world.” Find out: read the book! {*3}

Yet another friend of mine who is making an honest effort to be a good mother to her six year old, attended a birthday party for one of her daughter’s schoolmates. At the party, the girls went to the birthday girl’s room to look at her new posters on her wall. My friend walked in, and was shocked to find said wall covered with posters of Disney boys, some of them shirtless. She took her daughter away and the other “mothers” chided her for being too austere. “This is what little girls are supposed to do.” Ah, no. They’re six. It most definitely is not!

What ever happened to “parenting?” Well, specifically what happened is another article in itself. For now: an incremental path leading to the current state of affairs, where the lunatics are [metaphorically, though sometimes I wonder if literally] in charge of the asylum, and everyone else is trapped within its confines. The following stories show an unnerving trend:

• The mother who wants her 15-year-old daughter to be the next Jordan (and is saving up to buy her a boob job)

• Mummy’s little Lolita: The 11-year-old girl whose beauty treatments cost £300 a month to make her look like Barbie

• Outrage as children as young as 11 offered pole dancing lessons

• Surgery-mad mum lets 12-year-old daughter get boob job

Perhaps one of reasons for this change, is that “graduates” of these massive dumbing-down agendas (particularly in the USA and UK, the testing grounds for the programs) are now of child-rearing age. Have to confess, since I came back to the states, it is hard to meet a 20-something woman who I can even remotely relate to, and a good portion of 30-somethings are beyond hope as well. They are materialistic, ego-driven, non-critical citizens of the Brave New World. Thus, the Disney Corporation is free to do “whatever” [the hell] it wants:

Looking at the above images of Disney asset Emily Ozment, a non-citizen will spot the butterfly mind-control symbolism. Why’s the programmed “BFF” for Miley all in pink? The average non-critical mind, unaware of color symbology won’t even realize the significance of the “16” being pink, her dress for the occasion being red and why she is surrounded by the color purple. Those more aware, may realized exactly what Disney is marketing, and why she is holding the 16 where it lie.

One such individual [on those who does understand Disney’s motives], Michael at Hidden Agendas, has been posting a great series explaining the “Oz” programming [blog offline], hence saving myself and others the effort. If you really want to understand how pathetically open to suggestion the average consumer has become, sit down and spend just a few moments watching MTV’s My Super Sweet 16.

This show, aimed at your average middle-class teenager, glorifies spoiled rich princesses and the money their families spend on their Sweet 16 parties:

I had concluded, after only a couple of viewings, that the gullible public, now pressured by their children through the media (compounded by their peers), had moved from backyard gatherings to commemorate a mundane occasion, to taking out loans to pay for lavish parties they could not afford. Struck up a conversation with a friend who works in mortgage collections:

“By chance, do any of the customers you talk to, tell you they are in dire straits (i.e., in danger of losing their house), because they took out a home equity loan to pay for their daughter’s Sweet 16 party?”

“Oh my god! How did you know? It’s not like one or two people. It’s like 1 out of every 6 people I talk to. These people took out loans ranging from 20 to 30 thousands dollar loans for them.”

Oh how pathetic we’ve become. Ring a bell and Pavlov’s dog comes running. Bye-bye middle-class. A little reminder when looking for someone (be it your politicians or some foreign country) to blame for the economy: you did it to yourself. Sometimes, I wonder if they could get people to buy rich people’s shite if it were marketed right [turns out, I’m not the first to wonder]. Moving on:

Not to rehash an old topic, but trauma-based mind control victims [note Miley’s butterfly wings], have almost all (per Cathy O’Brien, Fritz Springmeier and others) experienced some form of incest. Disney themes go hand in hand. From Mickey Mouse to Marilyn Monroe to the newest face on the [¿chopping?] block (above center), Meaghan Jette Martin. The below [mm] video, synced with the above images of Miley, should raise the hair on the back of a few necks:

A lot of people, despite voluminous evidence (synchromystic, indirect, intuitive, and sometimes even, verbal and physical) to the contrary, and several authors pointing to multi-generational incest as a de facto mode of trauma based MPD programming, refuse to acknowledge the obvious when it comes to celebrity culture. Question: is it ever appropriate for any father be rubbing tanning oil between his daughter’s butt cheeks?

Caught in the act of gauging who his daughter’s “heart” belongs to, is Hulk Hogan [pro wrestling is a HUGE influence on the young, primarily boys]. I know I keep saying that one day, I’ll fully explain the origins of that heart symbol, but didn’t Marilyn say her “heart belongs to daddy?” Ew! Have to wonder why Angelina Jolie and dad (Jon Voigt) are “estranged?” Body language should not be taken lightly:

Speaking of Meaghan, very few pictures of or information about the Disney mega star in the making, could be found online. Did she just get out from under the tunnels [Disney’s mind-control center]? Her trivia page from IMDB, synchromystically analyzed, hints there is much much more to her “story:”

• She was seen in the workshop of Jason Robert Brown’s musical “13” [a conspicuous number, to say the least; also syncs with the unrelated movie, which details “tween” behavior discussed herein] as Kendra.

• Meaghan loves reading and is a huge fan of the Harry Potter [mind manipulative] series. She also enjoys writings by Mitch Albom [suspect + syncs us back to AJ’s daddy, Jon Voigt], Stephen King and Lewis Carroll [extreme mind-control programming].

• Loves the UK and would love to visit [¿if she’s never been there, than why does she love it?]. {*4}

• Her favorite Disney Channel show is Hannah Montana [¡of course!].

• She would love to work with Johhny Depp [syncs with condoms, see ItGDF] and Tim Burton one day.

• For her Camp Rock audition, she sang ‘Brand New You’ [¡brand new alter personality!] from the James Robert Brown musical play, “13”.

• First professional [¡word conspicuously missing!!] was a fashion model in a Disney fashion show when she was 5 [shouldn’t there then be some a lot of info/pics available from the past 11 years?].

Speaking of “new” stars, Disney is hard at work. Knowing the demographics of the [in-place] North American Union, it’s well under way to extend its appeal to the Latino market. {*5} Here is one of these next Disney properties, Selena Gomez, definitely already under the control of Disney wizardry, and ready to be the medium to extend that reach into the minds of Latino youth up and down the Americas:

Crafty marketing aimed at the Central American market by combining the name of deceased superstar Selena with one of the most common surnames from that region, no? Aside: Have to wonder, with the former dying at the significant age of 23, it there’s more to that story? The other Latino star in the making (I guess Disney wants to cover all bets) is from the new Camp Rock [depicted earlier]. Her resume also produces some interesting synchromystic connections:

• Her mom was a Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader during the the 1982-83 season [at the time, the group were media superstars, sought out by the rich and powerful], and was a country recording artist [per O’Brien, the hub of the CIA’s drug-distribution and mind-control network].

• Her favorite band is Paramore [¡absolute shite!] and her favorite song by them is “Born for This.” [bloodlines and programming]

• Her best friend is Selena Gomez [of course Disney assigned her this BFF].

• She started acting at the age of six [again, early start], when she landed [¡ha!] her first series regular role as Angela on Barney & Friends [been meaning to look into the purple dinosaur].

I now present you with Demi Lovato earning a few bucks recruiting for the US Army, and proving to even the most-programmed of minds, that Disney is selling us a lot more than “innocence.” The center clipping speaks volumes of the early mind-control princess programming that even she herself [Demi] is oblivious of:

“I never wanted a part more than this,” and “it was a dream to work with him?” Reminds me of something I once read/heard about young Princess Diana, and how she was programmed from an early age [¿princess programming for princesses?] for the task of mothering the future King of England [and perhaps, even more than that]. There was mention of how in her estates she would reside [and on the walls of the rooms she would sleep in], there would be exquisite portraits of Prince Charles posed in heroic warrior / white-knight poses. {*6}

Moving from the new Disney kids to the old, we find Lindsey Lohan back at work [finally]. Here she is selling condoms [I Know Who Killed Me], selling us cars (I think) and finally, worn out from all that marketing. While her film may have “sucked” in every sense of the word, the themes of multiple-personalities and mind-control were so overt, it was actually kind of fun [for me] to sit through. The alternating reds and blues were not subtle [may write up]. A giggle: immediately following her pitch line, cheesy porno music begins and they “get busy.”

Lindsey’s even been up to a little cross-marketing, selling us condoms [for LifeStyles, no less] and lesbianism [another agenda receiving heavy media rotation these days]. Katy Perry’s staged rip-off of Jill Sobule’s “I Kissed a Girl,” took what was once a decent song and turned it into a soulless teen anthem. I had been speculating that probably led to increased experimentation among teens/tweens, so was surprised to hear Freeman affirm that while on Alex Jones, of all places [forcing a revealing sync with a prior image of latest lesbian fantasy girl].

No wonder Lindsey needed some rest. She’s been a busy busy girl. No marketing opportunity is let slip, of course, so Katy Perry’s pitching the upcoming “Teen Choice” awards by saying she’s going to lock lips with Hannah and Miley. [It should surprise none this tool (Katy) is yet another Disney creation. Anyone think remaking the song in teen diva style was her idea?] Going back up the Queen of the Vulva lineage, let’s check on Britney [pictured on the Masonic checker-board, center]:

I really didn’t want to go there [again], but Hulk Hogan already took us there. Came across a rather disturbing article while putting this article together: The Media’s Silence About Rampant Anal Sex. Yes, that is Yet Another Agenda; this one getting heavy rotation from the XXX “industry.” Pavlov’s bell is ringing!

On the lighter side, I also came across some author’s pictorial of the abuse his daughter puts her doll collection through: Meet the Girls of Cell Block B. The article syncs well with the secondary themes of my last blog, yet still, somewhat disturbing is the question none dared ask: “What influences lead a child to emulate in such a manner?” Well, I think we have a pretty good idea herein. So, read on…

“Don’t ask me to apologise. I won’t ask you to forgive me.
If I’m gonna go down, you’re gonna come with me.”
–Elvis Costello, “Hand in Hand”

While Britney Spears has been remarkably silent on the prophylactic issue, her little sister, Jamie Lynn, while keeping her [upper] lips shut, has been targeted for advertising. I knew it wouldn’t take too long for the programmed masses [who know nothing of condoms, other than catch phrases and standard info regurgitated to them by the media], to subconsciously take up marketing for free [article]. Didn’t take long to find these two random images from random, um, “individuals:”

Viacom, which owns Nickelodeon, hence Jaime Lynn Spears’ ass, also owns MTV, and Comedy Central [notably, South Park], so they’ve got the tweens who are outgrowing Disney, and the teen market firmly under their thumb. All I have to say about the network [aside from the obvious] is to ask: what is the justification for putting out a child band that goes by the name of The Naked Brothers?

Are there no rational people left inside the entertainment field? I found two additional heavily syncing images of Jamie Lynn. The first, a screen capture from Nickelodeon’s “Slime Across America”, which I don’t feel the need, in light of everything I’ve already said, to expound on. As for the second, I would highly recommend anyone and everyone read Stygian Port’s excellent Room 101.

I should leave it alone, but did come across [ew, no pun intended, really] a fan-site called “disneyjuice.” Per the operator, “I created this blog because I am obsessed with everything disney.” I won’t be linking to it, cause it loaded some horrible horrible song which assaulted my brain while I vainly searched for a way to shut it off. However, the song synced a little too well with the above mileY OzMent 16 theme. It’s called “Now or Never” from High School Musical. If you dare/care to, listen to the lyrics, while looking at the previous images of Emily, and then tell me: Is it about “basketball” or pressuring 16 year old girls to have sex?

Speaking of High School Musical, while I still don’t have a final opinion (if there is such a thing) on back-masking, the five-part video seris [commencing below] does present some convincing arguments for the entire sound-track being subversive subliminals. However, it missed the most rational argument. These lyrics are so bloody awful and disjointed, a room full of monkeys picking random words out of fish-bowls could have produced an equally cohesive lyrical array in forwards mode.

Prior to publication, I also learned the Hannah Montana 3D concert [with guest appearance by Satan’s favorite little “suckers,” the Jonas Brothers], was being peddled on pay-per-view, with Wal-Mart [while “evil” is a highly subjective term, this corporation, as much as any other would qualify for the label] pushing the glasses on its victims customers. My “concerned friend” [mentioned earlier] asked my opinion on the issue [why the show was produced in said manner].

Well, logic would dictate that this isn’t Jaws III, or Friday the 13th III [both 3D movies]. So, what the hell is gonna be jumping out at the audience [¿miley’s rear?]? My guess would be 3D allows for more subliminals. Finding online research on the subject was fruitless, but these Jim Cameron quotes are telling:

“I believe that Godard got it exactly backwards. Cinema is not truth 24 times a second, it is lies 24 times a second.”

When you see a scene in 3-D, that sense of reality is supercharged. The visual cortex is being cued, at a subliminal but pervasive level, that what is being seen is real. So creatively, I see 3-D as a natural extension of my cinematic CRAFT.”

Hm! Referring back to the old sorceress/queen, Madonna, the below series of pics show all these themes and cross-marketing efforts and social engineering agendas are nothing new, they’re just done more openly now [for aforementioned reasons]. The last image [bottom right] forces one to wonder if “Satan” exacts a high price for fame and fortune. Alas, it’s a safe bet, that only the most foolhardy, would expect Madonna’s forthcoming “confession” to be an honest one:

I finally found a picture of that Pixie Magazine I previously mentioned [do read the definition of the word]. What’s really strange [i.e., a “clue”] about it, is that the magazine has no web-site [look for yourself if you wish]. Another is the conglomerate that owns it, Source Interlink Media [linked to Wal-Mart], doesn’t even list it in their catalog. So, as the cover asks, “Which one are you?” As I’ve begrudgingly accepted, no more subtlety is required about Disney mind control.

The final image, is just a [co]incidentally random picture which ties it all together: a sync to prior magazine. Raises the natural question, who the hell names their child “Pixie?” [And the other “Peaches?” Bob Geldof, that’s who.] A sync of respect for time served to Madonna [old movie]. “Up the amazon” works a little too well placed next to the dark spot going up her dress. Heart of Darkness anyone?

Would “without a paddle” keep that lesbian theme running, or is it a refernce to the proverbial “shit creek?” “Outshone by your children,” ties it back to theme of the new wave of parents powerless to influence their children. The Red and Black, combined with the “choice” placement of the “G” wreaks of Masonic overtones (see High School Musical 3rd Degree Initiation). And finally, the placement of the anchor [over the brain/mind], makes me recall a point another Alex once shared about anchors and mind manipulation.

I really am getting tired of rehashing this point over and over again. I must admit frustration that I sometimes have to explain images like this to some people:

During one such conversation, while trying to wake those I care about up the reality of what they’re willingly exposing their children to, and thereby consenting, someone asked me about their “options” [e.g., Nickelodeon]. There is only one option. Turn off their TV! No child under 6 should be exposed to any television. After that, limit, but educate [no, not through the schools]. It’s called parenting.

While my answer may have over-simplified matters, it was an honest evaluation of the average media growth path (particularly for girls): The point of Disney is to raise sexual awareness in your children,. Then, Nickelodeon comes along and sexually awakens them. After that, MTV comes in and completely turns them out.

This is not (by any means) a new agenda. It’s been going on for a [very] long time:

‘When we look back across the historical time of patriarchy . . . there seems to be some terrible inevitability, a relentless desire to crush the female essence, human and divine. The question of why is among the most puzzling of our time.’
–Elinor Gadon, historian

As previously stated, I no longer feel as much of a pressing need to try to awaken those immediately around me. That is a path of frustration and mental detriment. They have made their choice, and you really can’t wake up someone who is sleeping. Try too hard, and you’ll do nothing but anger them [I’m speaking literally and metaphorically]. But, children are a dilemma to that equation.

They aren’t making choices, and are relying on their parents to protect them while their mind develops. But, who is protecting them? Parenting has been turned over to the media, and thus, the developing minds of children have been turned over to The Media. The results, speak for themselves. So, I have no choice but to continue my struggle against this Brave New World. I am trying to re-write the book:

“O disgust! How many soulless creatures are there here and this void of blackness where their heart once lie! How degenerate yet mankind has become! O cowardly new world: That hath such shells of people in’t!”

Sound wisdom tells me to save only those who wish to save themselves. And, I’m sure many of those have found their way to me, and I to them. So, I ask to those who’ve helped me on this journey, and to those I’ve helped, where do we go from here?

 

Disclaimer: This article was written at an earlier stage of my development, thus it may contain some minor points which do not necessarily reflect my present belief set.

 

*1: Just a few recommended links on the topic: White Poison, Not Milk, PCRM’s Stong Bones. Even the media smeared “crook” Richard Nixon had a sense of fear/respect for the dairymen (i.e., the corrupt lobby) after they pressured him into a corporate welfare deal: “They are tough political operatives. This is a cold political deal.” [LB]

*2: Come to think of it, all these “leaked” photos floating about of Hannah/Miley in her undies, actually contradict her Dad’s statement that she “never wore underwear.” [LB]

*3: While writing this, I came across another blog reflecting on how many among us are eagerly rushing head-long into the Brave New World, Secret Sun’s Brave New World, Indeed. And credits to Pseudo-Occult Media for the Dinsey Princess picture I lifted off his page, and Michael Tsarion of introducing me to the Elinor Gadon quote. [LB]

*4: In one of the other articles, Miley says she “loves the UK.” Bobbing to please the Queen? More muppets ponying up for knighthood. Here’s a wacky Jonas Brothers meet the Queen video. Is that really her? Here’s an odd sync from same “tour” where someone throws a condom at them. [LB]

*5: I also found a Brasilian girl in Disney’s mix. What does Disney know that not even the “alternative media” has uncovered? I’m going to go on a limb, but after hearing both Hugo Chavez and the President of Brasil suggest a South American Union may be the remedy to an aggressive imperialist United States, I see a back-door being sold to the public. By hook or by crook? Recall, Che Guevara said something similar at one time. [LB]

*6: Yes, estates. Diana had more royal blood in her than Charles and was by no means some schoolteacher living a fairy-tale existence. Speaking of the Prince William who will turn XXX during the XXX Olympiad in 2012: anyone know what happened to Rik’s Cosmic Mind blog??? We also have a sync to XXX porn lifestyle marketing. [LB]

~ by celticrebel on August 1, 2008.