Following up from Goddess of the Vulva, I was surprised to see a commercial on Disney Channel announcing the upcoming double CD featuring Hannah Montana and Miley Cyrus. I had already surmised in said blog that she was without doubt the product of trauma-based mind-control. But, oh how boldly they now throw these clues to these multiple personality disordered children at us now.

An analysis of the below advertisement yields an abundance of encoded (yet some not so subtle) messages. Duality. An MM, and an HH. And another MM and HH (when we use the 2 as a multiplier). The Alpha and the Omega (her palindromic name). Subconscious hints at mountains (¿pyramids?). The dog star (Sirius). The announcement that her two personalities are finally going to meet (confirmation of MPD). Finally, the digitized image with the pixelized fade could be seen as an implication that she’s not real (which, outside the minds of her hypnotized fan base, she is not). Click on the image for the video, where more synchs may lie.

Is there a connection between Disney and Target? Well, the below synch would imply just that. Face it, during the panic of 1929, they came in and bought up all the publicly traded companies for pennies. The interlocking boards of directors have kept them in line since. Competition? Ha! Which brings me to 9/11, hence the following image from Spiegel’s article entitled Thirty Naked Pensioners at Ground Zero (complete with Mickey Mouse masks):

“The naked stand for people without means, the victims of capitalism, the underclass, who don’t have anything any more.”

I would add “communism and every other ism” to the above statement. The article could have a synchromystic analysis of it’s own, but I’ll just focus on nudity and Disney. For one, in the quoted context above, childhood Disney programming is what allowed us to be fleeced so easily. Secondly, the more I look at Disney, the more convinced I grow that it and nudity/sexuality are inseparable.

In the aftermath of the Vanity Fair photoshoot of one Hannah Montana, a few people have come to me and congratulated me on my prediction regarding Miley Cyrus (aforementioned Goddess of the Vulva article). Pardon the colloquial, but “I didn’t predict nothing.” I simply looked at train map and saw the line ran from El Paso to Albuquerque. When the train pulled into El Paso, I told you it was going to Albuquerque next. I’m no Edgar Cayce.

Curious, I went online to find out what all the fuss was about and came across this fluff piece in Forbes, which asks “Who’s Minding Miley?” No, that doesn’t suggest mind control. Who? Her handlers maybe. The below “sanctioned” pictures of the child-turned-teen star (far more lurid than the VF reaction test) should be an overt reminder of what “image” Disney is protecting and what it is selling us:

She is Disney “property.” [In every way conceivable.] She is a mind-controlled tool doing exactly what her handlers tell her. The “sex kitten” image on the right suggests she’s had the “sex slave” programming which Cathy O’Brien spoke of, and she may be “available” for the right price to the right individual. {*1} Strangely enough, backmasking the “Best of Both Worlds” song reveals that perhaps that Hannah’s “love [is] for sale.” Ugh! The train is on schedule and exactly where it is supposed to be. All you need to do is look at the progression of Britney Spears to see where the Disney track leads:

I like [am annoyed by] how Disney spun the incident: “Unfortunately, as the article suggests, a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines.” If you believe that I got a truckload of Pet Rocks to sell you. Let me remind everyone that Annie Leibovitz is a Disney photographer. [Synchronauts may find pics of use.] Finally, I was [not] so amazed to also learn that Disney makes and markets lingerie in China (see Disney’s Dirty Little (Victoria’s) Secret). [The models are over 18, so you don't have to feel dirty.] {*2} Well, at last, I finally figured out what the “V” in Victoria’s Secret stands for:

While the public was mostly focused on the Miley’s sheet [allegedly topless] shot, I found the suggestive “lovers” pose between her and her father far more disturbing, and also, supportive of the incest angle, which I also, ahem, “predicted” (same prior blog). Vanity Fair’s own “behind the scenes” video offers an even “creepier” look that Miley gives her father. [0:38] But all the proof one really needs are the two publicity shots below. See Minnie and Miley, both in red, both in a similar pose. See Minnie kissing Billy Ray as Miley turns away (suggestive of not seeing [or not wanting to see] it happening). Programmed MPD’s have no way of seeing what their other personality is doing. Voilà!

Keeping with the spirit of my last blog, I wondered what other Disney property had been demonstrating her vulva in public. Ah, Lindsay Lohan. {*3} I was unable to ascertain whether she was a Mouseketeer, but confirmed her debut role was as the “twins” in Disney’s remake of The Parent Trap. Interestingly enough, the twins of the original Parent Trap, were played by yet another HM, another Disney “property,” and yet another “most popular child actress of [her] era,” Haley Mills. {*4} A visionary of the time (and arguably, genius director of all time), Stanley Kubrick, saw through the Disney facade even back then and cast her as the perfect nymphet to play Nabakov’s Lolita. [Disney reconsidered and pulled her.]

Mills, was also born of royalty. I laugh back how at one time, as a child, I believed the lie they told us in school that “if we worked hard enough, one day we could become President of the United States.” Genealogy has proven that ambitious path an impossibility. I’m becoming convinced (as is Atlantean Times) that the notion that any of us commoners would ever be allowed to be “stars” may be yet another fairy tale we are sold as children. Not only are our politicians chosen for us, but so are our “stars.” Now, even People magazine is telling us that Hillary Clinton is related to Angelina Jolie and Madonna, while Barrack Obama is related to Brad Pitt and George Bush? {*5}

On one hand, a mainstream admission of secrets normally relegated to “conspiracy nuts,” and on the other, Disney throwing their deceptions in our face. This seems beyond Michael Hoffman’s “revelation of the method.” Are they so confident of how far along the general public has been dumbed down now, that they feel they can openly boast of what’s going on in front of our face. Or, is it the effects of Pluto? Answer found below: “No More Secrets, No More Lies.”

The above picture also yields several other synchromystic nuggets. The four stars, four sides, four background personalities. The one in the middle, or pinnacle/eye resonant of the xmas tree/pyramid. Strong imagery of Isis / Cybele / Astarte (or Queen Sumerimus/Statue of Liberty, if you prefer). The five points of a pentagram? Finally, the intentional placement of the flower (and what that suggests), with the stem intersecting Miley’s vagina. If you actually think for a moment that none of dozens of staff working on the campaign noticed this, than I’m sure you’ll also rationalize away the following photos too:

The Vanessa Hudgens fiasco, which I’ll not get into here, went remarkably smooth for Disney. “Outrage” over, she has been retained as a Disney Property and will star in the next High School Musical too. The photo on the right speaks for itself (¿are there two frogs behind her?). I included the one on the left, because I’ve been wanting to ask the parents of preteens who buy their daughters shorts with the words “juicy” on the butt: “What the hell is wrong with you?” Backmasking again, forces us to deal with Miss Hudgens singing of masturbation (and coincidentally, her ass). {*6} How many cycles of exposure, outrage, apology does it take to break Disney’s “parent trap?” [Infinite?]

Back to Hannah. I mean Miley. Oh, whatever! I’ll denote the safety projected by the color blue (I gather that’s aimed at the parents holding the credit cards), but will leave the rest for you to interpret:

I was nearly floored by the following discovery: Miley’s “best friend” is co-star Emily Osment . [Oz!] Are you f’n kidding me? Their names are anagrams of each other’s. The handlers must control every aspect of these girl’s lives. Notice how the below cover of Teen magazine tells girls “what not to do,” yet shades out the word not in a softer tone/color, thereby perceived by the brain as “what do do” followed by the next word our eyes take in, “hot guys here” or “rock stars you love” (depends on if you’re left or right-brained).

A delayed checkout at the grocery store, allowed my own eyes to wander about long enough to stumble on a synch from a preteen tabloid entitled Pixie, which contained a story (blurb) about how Emily & Miley were BFFLs. {*7} Per wikipedia, “In Holly Black’s works, pixies are green-skinned, human-sized faeries with shimmering wings. They have a command of glamour and a type of power to charm or seduce others.” So, finding a pic of Emily on the “Green Team” at Disney? I’m overwhelmed. How do these girls cope with all this control and debauchery? Well, as Emily synch-winks us: “I don’t think about it.”

I’d actually recommend reading the the Teen article for some odd indirect quotes about their staged lives. Seeing them with the puppies (below) and noting how the one’s black pyramidal jaw is pointing up to Cyrus makes me think of Sirius (the dog star). Which leads to this interesting picture of the joker (the fool) communicating to us (or Miley) from the other side of the mirror (¿the “other side”?). [Pic from Inside the Cosmic Cube.] Does everything going on presently have to synch back to Heath Ledger? Maybe. Am I reaching with this Cyrus/Sirius connection? In their own words: Miley Cyrus Star of Disney’s ‘Hannah Montana’ to Take Over SIRIUS Satellite Radio Music Channel. R U Serious???

What about the fans? The first pic below is from some event where all the girls who came got “Hannah makeovers.” Um, excuse me, but doesn’t it seem kind of inappropriate to have all these little girls holding microphones with purplish/pink tinted heads on them? Didn’t any adult working this event (or attending) say, “Um, this just doesn’t feel right?” The grown woman to the right (of the first photo) is appropriately pictured; some random object blocking her face, because though she has eyes, she cannot see. On the right, some screaming HM fans. Who’s Minding Miley? Who’s minding their own children? If you are an ignorant piece-of-shit excuse for a Mother, please raise your hand and scream. Thank you!

Reminds me of another fanatic group of young women from a long time ago. The two girls on the right, were chanced upon (and if I recall correctly, from a spoof site), but that seems apropo as we connect back to back to the joker/fool, and synch wonderfully with Daria Invictus’ foray into the Smiley Face murders.

I was unsure where this blog would take me once I began to write/compile it, and whence in the middle of it, I could find no way out … until presented with the below image of Cyrus in The Daily Behemoth. I’ll concur with Ben and leave Miley’s “devil-salute” for Texe Marrs and others, but am wondering where have I seen that face before? Aha! Found it!

Predictably, after I wrote Post-Subliminal Era Has Begun, pointing out Disney’s repeated use of sexual imagery, many criticized me as “kooky” or “paranoid.” I will assume that after this, many of those same people will call me a “pervert.” I’m getting the impression those are programmed responses designed to prevent anyone from really looking into such matters.

But, my question is: What is the appropriate response to a mother/father who turns over the development of their child to the Disney corporation? What is the appropriate response to someone who repeatedly denies the obvious and dismisses all those who try to open their eyes to truth? What is the appropriate response to those who work in the belly of the beast (so to speak) and propagate these ills on our children? Because, there are no programmed responses to them.

Well, I have crawled along the underbelly of the beast and I don’t like what I found there. Yes, I do feel dirty. I am going to go take a long shower now. I need to wash this stench off my soul.

---

:: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

---

*1: Cathy O’Brien’s Trance-Formation of America goes into disturbing detail about the sexual programming of children that takes place in the Monarch mind control programs. Aside from the role of the mass mind-control I’m discussing, she details how Disney themes are used in the creation of “sex slaves” for the rich and powerful. The book comes across as shocking and unbelievable at first, but further research / revelations back up her claims. [LB]

*2: Apparently, posing models as underage girls is quite normal for Disney in China, as the following link (sent to me by a collaborating friend) suggests. [LB]

*3: In an odd sequence of timing, or should I say synchromysticism, the Vanity Fair issue in question, came out during the same week as the murder of “DC Madam” Debra Jean Palfrey (if you think it was a suicide, you’ll believe anything). The cover of the issue features Robert F. Kennedy, and incidentally Dan Moldea who wrote a book supporting the “official” account of RFK’s assassination (and denying mind control of Sirhan Sirhan) was also the media source for her alleged, and laughable, “I am not going back to prison. I will commit suicide first” statement. And let’s not forget that Kennedy was intimately linked to another infamous MM, “suicided” mind-controlled sex-slave Marilyn Monroe. [Oops! Synched back to Heath Ledger.] [LB]

Linsey Lohan posed as Marilyn Monroe. [¿ LL + 2 = MM ?] Click image for full, ahem, spread.

*4: It also occurred to me that especially with 50’s technology, it would have been far easier and cheaper to find a real set of twins to play the part. It would seem that one person with two roles/personalities was/is/will-be the most important part of this repeating story. [LB]

*5: Fritz Springemeier’s Bloodlines of the Illuminati details these bloodlines and even discusses mind-control. A prior blog takes a humorous look at our last few presidents as related to the wretched Bavarian House of Windsor. As Michael Tsarion observes, there’s a good reason why celebrities and royalty all walk the “red carpets,” as fitting for those descended of “royal blood.” [LB]

*6: The “reverse lyrics” rabbit hole also finds alleged “Christian” trio of soulless Jonas Brothers ruining a perfectly good Kim Wilde song, but frighteningly [in forward mode] informing us they [and their legions of mindless followers] may in fact be our future. I can’t say without doubt how/if the subconscious processes backwards messages, and can barely fathom the level of intelligence/intuition required to write songs in such manner. I leave you with another backmasking example from Miss Hudgens, which takes a few too many liberties, but it’s entertaining nonetheless.) [LB]

*7: I view the BFFL (best friends for life), BFF, BFFEE and whatnot phenomenon as destructive programming, the same way I view the “princess programming” (happily ever after forever and ever) we subject our daughters to. Simply, it sets up children with false expectations and leads to a life of repeated disappointment. I may expand on the topic in a later blog on shaping the human mind. [LB]

* SPECIAL THANKS: To my dear friends Renee and Lana for our talks, your leads, and help in wrapping my brain around this quagmire.

Anyone subjected to the movie Independence Day (1996), had to deal with a blatant violation of the laws of time and space, as Jeff Goldblum’s father, despite being a slow-driving old codger, somehow drove from New York to Washington DC (while both cities were under evacuation), in less time than one could make the trip under ideal conditions. Critics of the surface story pointed this out as an inconsistency, but those who understand the ritual act of revealing, know the whole point was inform the subconscious of future victims these two cities would be attacked on 09:11:01 (Godlbum’s laptop). {*1} The subsequent picture, of Lisa Simpson coaxing the family into a trip to New York (1997 episode), however, may simply fall under what Jake Kotze refers to as synchromysticism, a chance foreshadowing of the “911 Mega-Ritual.” {*2}

Under the guise of comedy though? What is going on? Surprisingly, the death (likely ritual sacrifice) of Heath Ledger took me on unexpected path. {*3} His upcoming postmortem Batman movie, based on the “Killing Joke” storyline from the Dark Knight series, pauses one to reflect on a startling discovery from The Meta-Logic Cafe. Now, I’m finally beginning to understand why the mass media has insisted on putting the phrase “9/11″ into our psyche (as opposed to “September 11″ or “09/11/01″):

“I’ve just realized something relatively mind-blowing:
The letter A is the 1st letter of the alphabet, and H is the 8th.
9/11 (9 divided by 11) = 0.81 81 81 81 infinity = ha ha ha ha …”

I had always been a fan of the band Killing Joke. Their music was a hard-edge fusion between punk and avant-garde, that was angry, inspiring and above all, something lacking in most bands that have come out in the last 30 years, original. While my mind forgot, a commenter (AstroSphynx) reminded me that the name of their live album was “Ha!” The two pictures below can only stir the mind that, mathematically, as the chance of repetition approaches infinity, the chance of coincidence approaches zero.

I’m sure, at first, to many, except for the most die-hard of synchronauts, the idea of 9/11 as some kind of cosmic joke may sound “insane.” Speaking of insane, didn’t Jack Nicholson say that playing the Joker “almost killed him?”. Ledger took on the role, could then barely sleep, locked himself in a hotel room for a month to prepare, and was found in a manner similar to Marilyn Monroe. [Another sacrificial lamb?] In Jack’s own words on not being “chosen:”

No. It’s like, in any area, you can’t believe the reasons things do or don’t happen. Not asking me how to do the sequel is that kind of thing. Maybe it’s not a mistake. Maybe it was the right thing, but to be candid, I’m furious.

Do these words remind you of how in ancient times, it was allegedly considered an honor to be sacrificed? If mankind hopes to advance, then the joker/fool must die? I’m forced to ponder Mercurial Talisman’s reminder that in Tarot, the Fool (card zero) strives to return us to [ground] Zero. [Fight Club Revisited, The Butterfly Legend.] Still, I’m hard pressed to explain away the following synchromystic cookies:

I’ve covered the synchs between the towers and the number eleven while discussing Oliver Stone’s last film, but will point out that 9+1+1=11. The cartoon images above, may appeal to my inner child, but “understanding” remained elusive. Despite Jake Kotze’s excellent articles/videos on the 9/11 “Pillarmids” and his core of schematic support showing the how the layout of the Giza pyramids matched the three towers in lower Manhattan, the pylarmid concept didn’t become clear in my own mind, until I saw these ashtrays in a catalog: {*4}

Perusing same catalog, I came across the pyramid shaped computers. I doubt the marketeer was trying to match a Giza layout, but the rainbow offering was too much to casually flip past. A mental connection is made to the Food Pyramid. Remember when the 4 Basic Food Groups (nonsense created by and lobbied for by various agricultural concerns) became the Food Pyramid? {*5} When did it also come with a Rainbow option? Up until I undertook my last blog (The Butterfly Legend), I hadn’t delved into the meaning of rainbows), but now the “Rainbow Connection” seems obvious:

I literally stumbled across the Myspace page of the Rainbow Connection day care center, hence the bears on the above right. And, what are the odds of the woman running the place would be exactly 33 years old at this point in time, and why the bears? [And what of Ursa Majors and Golden Compasses?] This joke is of MonuMental proportions.

I can’t help but reflect on another prior blog discussing Eyes Wide Shut (another movie featuring the water nymph named Nicole Kid-Man), which in my present state, makes me think my own eyes were still far from “wide open” when I wrote it. [Would that be kid as in "child" or as in "haha?"] {*6} The Wrong Way Wizard has since written a more recent and meticulously thorough analysis of that movie:

Note how when presented with a golden opportunity to go to the end of the rainbow, Tom Cruise opts instead for the seedier “conspiratorial” path under it. Was he following his conditioning from societal mores and programmed perceptions of right and wrong? And, ultimately, isn’t that the same path we are drawn to when we first begin to awaken as well? I am reminded of another song from another band, Golden Earring, but that can wait. [The band's name does seem Saturnalian, no?]

Pyramids and Rainbows? Where is this going? A KooKie monster and King Kong at the twin towers? The K2 resonant Giza and the layout of the pylarmids. Kublai Khan and Xanadu. Kaptain Kirk and Krispy Kreme. niKole Kidman and her scrumptious read end? [Oops! Opened the sweet candy synch.] I was growing skeptical of this Rosebud KK connection, and then I stumbled across this:

So, Homer Simpson went to meet street vendor Khav Kalash at the base of the pylarmids? Now, I’ve seen it all! [I jest.] Wait … Kalash is food vendor? I had just started considering Jake Kotze’s recent statement about how our body is a stargate of sorts, with our mouths being the entrance. The path “under” the rainbow inevitably leads to shit, while the path “across” it to absorption and transmogrification? I seem to recall a movie scene where a stargate/wormhole experiment resulted in some being turned into a literal pile of poo. [I did say "rear end" earlier, didn't I?] So, it came of little surprise to me to subsequently learn that the etymology of our exit hole may lead back to the Egyptian Anu, “the seat of the cult of the Sun-god.”

Notice the serpentine path, particularly the head of the snake. Wormholes and multi-colored spiraling circular paths? And now, “real” pyramids painted as rainbows? {*7} Even the business world is using the pyramids (below center), and it should, cause if you look at the word “business” which has been hidden under our nose for so long, it becomes plain to see that word is actually “busyness,” the state of being perpetually “busy;” busy under the impression that you are “making” money, while you are actually spinning your wheels, going nowhere, as those above you on the pyramid laugh all day.

The last image above, while pilfered from some “Pyramid Scheme” site, invokes the serpent lore, and speaks strongly of influence and control. Michael Tsarion’s Sons of the Serpent and William Bramley’s Brotherhood of the Snake come immediately to mind. I will avoid the tangent of flying feathered snakes, yet try to get back to the beginning (is that an Ouroboros impulse or a Fool’s quest?), dare I say back to “ground zero?” [Fight Club Revisited] Odd, how I have to go back to the beginning (911), in order to get to the end? I wonder where else has 911 been hidden right under our very noses? Oh, never mind.

So, the number 911 is intimately associated with death, mayhem and above all, blood. If you follow Michael Tsarion’s theory of the sacrificial deal our masters made with the macro-organisms, then the association should seem natural. Blood. Red carpets. Bloodlines. Flashing red lights. Trauma. Fear! The “Code Red” image also synchs with a movie I just saw this weekend, 28 Weeks Later, where it stood for annihilating the human population. The movie, on the surface, was yet another mindless remake of 28 Days, yet it starred Oz-resonant Matrix-navigator Harold Perrineau as the helicopter pilot!

I will have to (in the interests of not spinning too far away and losing focus) refrain from going into Oz, helicopters, or any of the innumerable avenues these synchs could take us. {*8} Pause. Wonder. Is that the whole point? And why is it that all these elements, which seemed so innocuous to us at one time, are so ever-present and obvious to me now? Is it my continued awakening, or is that my ego’s answer? Are we, all mankind, being hurtled towards the end of a funnel as projected by mathematician Marko Rodin? Thus, as we approach the vortex, time and space are pushed closer and closer together? [Listen to his Red Ice interview.] Did I just send you to Red Ice? That does indeed seem slippery.

Maybe we now understand why it was so important that so many firefighters and policemen were sacrificed on 9/11. They were already dressed and marked for slaughter when they arrived on the scene. But, now I see a trend of us (and I’m no longer sure if I [or eye] can claim I was the one guiding this journey), moving further away from the scintillating rainbow towards the exclusive domain of the color red. Am I now also leading us under the rainbow instead of across it? [Fool's Gold?] Well, thanks to this last pyramid, I finally have a way out. Now would be the time for the aforementioned lyric from Golden Earring: “Where am I to go now that I’ve gone too far?”

“So long, farewell, auf wiedersehen, good night, I hate to go and leave this pretty sight.” The rabbit hole may run very deep, and it may be leading us in [concentric?] circles and what form will we take if we come out the other side? “I’m glad to go, I cannot tell a lie. I flit, I float, I fleetly flee, I fly.” [KK's Falafel?] “The son has gone to bed and so must I.”

*1: The film also features Will Smith, who last movie was covered in my last blog. Makes me wonder if the terms “freedom” (as in Freedom Tower) and “independence” (as in Independence Day) refer to our or their liberation (Tsarion’s trapped Atlanteans). The movie in question, also featured the sickening “I’m not Jewish” -> “Not everyone’s perfect” exchange of dialogue, which leads me back to the Zionist angle from Oliver Stone 911 Truther. [LB]

*2: As luck would dictate, I found the Simpsons clip online, but by the time I got around to writing this, 20th Century Fox corporation had it pulled from YouTube, claiming copyright. Excuse me! How can you copyright something you transmit over the airwaves? Our fascist government dictates through their kangaroo kourts that we have no right to privacy when we transmit our voice through the aether, yet corporations can hold on to the rights of the very material they transmit through our common air, the houses we “own” and even our own bodies? Don’t expect the Saturnalian judges to grant us justice. ["Just ice?" How temporary and fleeting. Perhaps they grant us exactly that?] [LB]

*3: Atlantean Times has done a few blogs delving further into the Heath Ledger mystery. The Secret Sun has gone deep into the rabbit hole of the Killing Joke synch. [LB]

*4: Ash reminds me of the ash that tons of steel, concrete and human remains were “miraculously” turned into on 9/11, pyroclastic flows and such. So, the pylarmid ashtrays may be more than appropriate. [LB]

*5: John Robbins does an excellent job of elucidating the idea of how very little understanding of nutrition, and a whole lot of industry pressure from various big business concerns shaped the fiction we were taught as children in Diet for a New America. [LB]

*6: Nicole’s big screen debut (of substance) was in the water thriller Dead Calm. Most nude scenes of her I recall, have a water source nearby. “Water Nymph” may apply. [LB]

*7: Perhaps. If we follow the school of thought that implies the pyramids were places of transcendence to the next world/dimension, than the Rainbow [bridge] colors are correct. [LB]

*8: Recommend this video for the helicopter/stargate explanation. Did want to note that two of the characters pictured above, and the “rainbow connection” singing Kermit/Osiris were all created by Frank Oz [LB]

[Ecclesiastes 1:9] What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Is there anything of which one can say, “Look! This is something new”? It was here already, long ago; it was here before our time. There is no remembrance of men of old, and even those who are yet to come will not be remembered by those who follow. I have seen all the things that are done under the sun; all of them are meaningless, a chasing after the wind.

So, to all you synchronauts out there, who’ve been of immeasurable help to me in writing this article, I thank you: Jake Kotze, Steve Willner, The Secret Sun, Atlantean Times, Mercurial Talismans, Through the Looking Glass, Truther Thoughts, Meta-Logic Cafe, Inside the Cosmic Cube, The Wrong Way Wizard, Kentroversy, and to any others who I’ve failed to “remember” or have yet to synch with.

*9: “But, I think back to the Wizard of [Lee Harvey] Oz [wald], and how Dorothy [Kilgallen] was told she always had the power to alter her reality simply by clicking her [Jack] Ruby ['s] Red slippers together.” [LB]

“To you,” said Jesus to his elect disciples, “it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of God, but to them [the πολλοι] it is not given; therefore speak I to them in parables [or allegories]: because they seeing, see not, and hearing, they hear not, neither do they understand.” [Matthew, courtesy of H.P. Blavatsky] What does this passage have to do with a movie review? Nothing and everything.

I had been looking forward to seeing I Am Legend, especially after noting the numerological significance of the 12/14/07 release date (i.e, “33,” discussed previously). Upon initial viewing, however, the analysis of this movie was going to be quite short, because while I observed a whole lot in the arena of the “the real sales pitch,” accompanied by a liberal sprinkling of “disinformation“, I found very little “actual dissemination of arcane knowledge.”

From the very beginning I got the impression we were going to receive a [un?] healthy doses of predictive and neuro-linguistic programming. The reappearing butterfly/monarch imagery is usually a pretty good indicator of heavy mind control. {*1} I could elaborate more on the topic, but Ben Fairhall has done an outstanding job, which I doubt I could improve on. [Unfortunately, from the time I viewed this film, until I re-viewed the film and completed this write-up, the article has gone "private." Let's hope it resurfaces at some point.]

The virus turning its victims into parasitic vampires, while symbolic, reminded me too much of 28 Days Later, which in every way imaginable, on the surface level (i.e. the plot), is a far superior film. We’re told the virus is a constantly mutating super-virus, which should indicate to an aware individual, that the virus was probably hatched out of someplace like Fort Dietrich, much like AIDS. {*2}

The president then issues an executive order to seal off New York City and blow all the bridges connecting it to the mainland. How bloody annoying! Is this conditioning the gullible public to accept executive orders are legitimate laws? Executive orders were never meant for anything other than deciding what china to use for the state dinners or who to invite to the White House Xmas party. Their use as directives or law is a flagrant violation of the constitution.

More ominous, from a synchromystic perspective, is whether the scene was symbolic of destroying the rainbow bridge (recommend link, will be referencing again later), thereby trapping our souls here on this plane of existence. The choice of the parallel bridges (the Manhattan and Brooklyn) synchs heavily with the Bifrost. The road to Valhalla is lost! {*3}

I also had a major problem with the movie promoting animal testing as somehow beneficial. Never has been. Never will be! All it does is perpetuate a cycle of waste and cruelty, dehumanizing each and everyone of us, because the practice condemns us all. To any reading this who condone the practice, yet vociferously complain about the “inhumane” conditions a lot of people in this world have to endure:

“What I think about vivisection is that if people admit that they have the right to take or endanger the life of living beings for the benefit of many, there will be no limit for their cruelty.” –Leo Tolstoy

So, Will Smith, the Scientologist, is working on a vaccine to cure the infection. A vaccine? “You idiot.” I wanna shout. Vaccines never stopped anything. As a matter of fact, vaccines have caused way more ills than they’ve cured. Oh wait, this falls under “superficial means to sell products.” Sorry, I forgot. They gotta sell vaccines for the vaccine manufacturers. Gotta pay for the special effects!

I will concede the film one noble plot point, cause it hints that the projected “cure” for Cancer may have actually ended up causing the entire problem. If you believe that cancer is caused by genetics and even for a second, blame your fore-fathers (who living naturally and free of vaccinations rarely if ever died of any form of cancer), then you’ve been the victim of a mild form of mind-control called media brainwashing.

I was about to give up on the film, but my attention perked back up again, when one of the few surviving members of human-kind “showed up.” A Brazilian woman. Well, how lucky is that? If one of the few surviving women left on this planet happened to be Brazilian … well then … there’s hope for us all. Slightly reinvigorated, my mind caught a few overt or cryptic items of note:

• As he was filling up, the price of gas was $6.63 a gallon. Um, if that’s predictive programming, get ready for an expensive 2009.
• The “ground zero” expression is mentioned twice, including at the end when he uses it as the justification for why he “can’t leave” Manhattan. [Man-Atom? Man-Aten?] This opens some interesting possibilities with the 911 Mega-Ritual and the Stargate, and also causes me to reflect on Ouroboros (Fight Club Revisited) and the Freedom Tower due to arise from Ground Zero in 2012.
• Will Smith plays Bob and the Brazilian woman is named Anna. Both of these are palindromes. Perhaps another hint at “the Alpha and the Omega” and the Ouroboros serpent?
• Anna saying she came from “Maryland” connects her to the Virgin Mary, Isis, Astarte lineage. Also, she said that she and her son were going to “Vermont” (the “free” state, i.e., “freedom”).
• Anna’s son’s named Ethan, which means “strong, permanent, perennial, ever-flowing,” hence a synch with Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain (Ver-Mont in French) Boys, hence Osiris.
• Will Smith quots Bob Marley saying “How Can I Light Up the Darkness?” while playing the Legend album. Interestingly enough, as the camera pans across the mantle prior to this keystone scene, the Kermit/Osiris frog is shown, followed by Van Gogh’s Starry Night (a reach, but possible link to Astarte).
• The disease having a 90% kill rate sounds pretty much in line with the Elite’s depopulation agenda. With uncanny timing, Prince Philip, the same inbred moron who said he wants to reincarnate as a virus and kill us (humans) off, has fallen gravely ill.

The above items, in conjunction with some of the aforementioned elements, force me to ponder if the Butterfly, on a deeper level, implies a positive metamorphosis. [¿trance-formation?] Further, I wonder whether some things we conditionally label as “bad,” and prefer to avoid, may be painful, yet necessary steps we have to undergo nonetheless. My optimistic side considers that if the 911 Ritual opened the Stargate (his daughter and wife dying while in the helicopter could be a metaphor for transcendence), than the “ground zero” event may have been positive step towards the next stage of our evolution (no, not the shallow Darwinian view) … until I ask myself, “Then why would they destroy the Rainbow Bridge?”

The film was begging for a second screening, but that final sticking point, made the task seem abhorrent. This was not metamorphosis. This was mind control, and of the type used by our hidden masters to beat down humanity for aeons; keeping us ignorant, fearful and unable of realizing even a fraction of our true potential. I also have to consider that perhaps spending too much time looking at movies lately, may have led to myself being dumbed-down somewhat, and perhaps I had a hard time differentiating whether certain messages were intended for insiders or the masses. I chose another film that weekend, The Simpson Movie and surprisingly, found quite a bit of surface “truth” in it. That movie rather bluntly informs us:

• Arnold Schwarzenegger will be our future President (¿2012?)
• The President’s masters do not allow him to make any important decisions.
• Mickey Mouse is the “symbol of an evil corporation.* [Yes, he is.]
• The NSA is listening in on every insignificant detail of our lives, but have yet to learn anything even remotely connected to terrorist activity.

Perhaps, I was expecting much more from I Am Legend because of the synch with Independence Day (which also featured Will Smith). Under the guise of what I refer to as “the ritual act of revealing,” the latter movie spelled out, in very clear subconscious language, that on 09/11/01, New York and DC would be attacked. The closing of I Am Legend does throw out a possible synchromystic nugget:

In 2009, a virus came. On September 9, 2012 @ 8:49 PM he found a cure, @ 8:52 PM he gave his life.

I would seriously doubt that direct a message would be provided so overtly in a movie like this, despite the heavy-handed Christ/Conan metaphor. {*4} Breaking down the numbers numerologically, aside from the obvious, we also get an 11 and a 23 in there, but of more significance, we get two doses of Jesus’s “3″ days later, in the form of minutes and in years. [It then occurred to me that one "3" in the trinity was missing. Would it be the one we'd at to $6.63 to get 666? Aha, trifecta!] Perhaps, I myself was stuck on an inappropriate level of evaluation? The rabbit hole may go even deeper than I had fathomed…

The aforementioned scene with Smith quoting Bob Marley was the root of my dilemma. “How can I light up the darkness?” Notice the deliberate pause as he speaks these exact words. He’s not quoting. He is asking? He is asking the same question that Jesus answered for his followers at the beginning of this article. And, it is the same question we should be asking ourselves. “What can I do?” The answer to this ancient riddle is right under our nose, right in front of our very eyes. But we can not hear, and we cannot see.

We are the eye at the top of the pyramid. Rather than looking to others for blame or answers, we need to look within ourselves.

I was now ready for the answer, it synchronistically appeared. I found it/it found me. The answer lies in the alternate ending to the movie. If you haven’t seen it, I highly recommend doing so before proceeding further (fortunately, someone has posted a copy online for the time being). Once I saw this, my entire perception of the movie changed. Suddenly, the whole movie makes perfect sense (on the deeper levels).

Will Smith, in spite of his Christ identification (likely from indoctrination) resists the path of sacrifice, and acknowledges, he is not the Jesus in the Matthew / Blavatsky parable. His eyes are open. He puts down the gun, and opens the door to his bestial adversary. The ghoul/zombie shows he is not a raving head-smashing lunatic, but only wants his mate/lover which Will Smith, captured, imprisoned and subjected to clinical torture. The butterfly serves as a metaphor for transformation, and the glass separating the adversaries proves to be nothing more than a mirror.

“When we ourselves are the living graves of murdered beasts, how can we expect any ideal conditions on this earth?” –George Bernard Shaw

The ghouls/humans now go on their own path, and Will Smith takes Ethan and Anna away to Bethel (yes, Bethlehem), Vermont. And what is that they cross on their way out? A bridge? Weren’t all the bridges destroyed? So, the rainbow bridge has been restored. And how was that done? By looking within and finding our own humanity again, and realizing our own power to change our world; by stopping to look for adversaries to blame for our own ills.

Someday we’ll find it, the rainbow connection — the lovers, the dreamers, and me. –Kermit the Frog, aka Osiris

So, one question now remains. Why was this ending removed from the theatrical cut? The ending alone changes the entire continuity of the story. Was the chosen ending indicative of something more insidious at work? And, which hand was it (per Christopher Knowles, the “who” may not necessarily be as obvious as the director). That question, I will leave for others to riddle.

---

:: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

---

*1: I counted five (in order): the poster he drove by, his daughter making the shape with her hands. a live one in the corn field, his daughter repeating it before the helicopters came, the voice he hears at the end. I missed: the butterfly in the shattering glass, Anna’s tattoo, the tattoo on the patient/vamp on the table. [LB]

*2: The ghoulish/vampirish appearance of the victims, may or may not be planned association with the effects of the bioengineered AIDS virus. The aversion to SonShine that the Infected/Vampires have though, does raise an interesting sync with another solar movie (Sunshine) by Danny Boyle (28 Days), which I discussed in a prior blog. [LB]

*3: I had always had a fascination for Bifrost, the Rainbow Bridge, that Norse (i.e., Gaelic) warriors had to cross to enter Valhalla. The Greek’s had Iris, the Goddess of Rainbow. This winged figure was the “messenger” the Gods used to communicate with humans, and interestingly enough, one of her duties was leading the souls of dead women to the Elysian Fields. She was born of a goddess and a Titan, hence was a half-human hybrid, which I believe comes from the Titan side, the one I feel mankind should have been rooting for in the war between the “Gods” and Titans. [LB]

*4: Yes, the similarities between Jesus and the warrior priest Conan are “legend,” but outside the scope of this article. However, while pondering the former idea, it occurred to me that the scene dwelling on the movie Shrek seemed rather innocuous and random at first, until you see Ethan/Osiris identifies with the Green Man (Shrek), while Will/Bob/Jesus identifies with the donkey. [LB]

The ideas for my blog, used to come from planning; a list of topics I wanted to educate myself on. I would then read books on the subject(s), and/or seek other sources of enlightenment. Occasionally, they would come from inspiration. Lately however, they’ve been the results of pure synchronicity.

A couple of weeks ago, a friend, “Black Healthologist,” forwarded a bulletin about Polygyny. Two days later, I came across a related article in Psychology Today. Shortly thereafter, the FLDS situation in Eldorado began to develop. I pondered the uncanny timing, recalling that Waco happened around this time of the year. {*1} Another group of people tried in the media with false stories and then burned alive to commemorate the festival honoring the Celtic Fire-God Baal? {*2} More importantly, were we going to consent to this ritual taking place in front of our eyes yet again?

A topic is born. First, I know that most people will have an immediate averse reaction to the idea of Polygyny. If you’ve been following my blog, that backlash alone should be a good indicator to pause and reflect on the source of this averse reaction. Perhaps, media programming? As one person I mentioned the topic to vociferously replied, “That’s unnatural! Monogamy has always been the norm.” Says who? What exactly is your reference point to “always”?

Almost every aspect of our lifestyle is unnatural, particularly in “modernized” (alternately, westernized or industrialized) societies. Every part of life that we consider “normal” has been designed to: prevent us from living in communities, shut us off from our neighbors, relegate most conversations to the realm of the mundane, {*3} prevent us from ever realizing our true potential, and more importantly, keep us tuned in to the television for our reality:

Many will recall reading Fahrenheit 451 at some point in their youth. No, we don’t live in a society where firemen go around burning books (yet), but how many people still read books to educate themselves? [Not talking about the dumbed-down education/indoctrination system.] And, out of those, how many read books that are actually enlightening (i.e., not magazines, romance novels, diet-books, newspapers, celebrity insights, and other such garbage). One could argue that sending men out to burn books would be superfluous. However, one of the less publicized (in the public consciousness) aspects of the book, was that in this ominous futuristic world, there were no more front porches:

“‘There used to be front porches. And people sat there sometimes late at night, talking when they wanted to talk, rocking, and not talking when they didn’t want to talk. Sometimes they just sat there and thought about things, turned things over. My uncle says the architects got rid of the front porches because they didn’t look well. But my uncle says that was merely rationalizing it; the real reason, hidden underneath, might be they didn’t want people sitting like that, doing nothing, rocking, talking, that was much the wrong kind of social life.’”

Look around you. Ever stop and wonder why few (if any) homes are being built with front porches anymore? Ever live in one of the older communities where people had them? Notice the strong bonds of community and spirit of brotherhood present? So, the question is when/why did architects stop designing them? {*4}

It would be of little surprise then, to discover that the history (our reference point to “always”) of monogamy, likely goes back to the same place where monotheism comes from. Presently, I’m leaning towards the theories espoused by Michael Tsarion (derived from Sigmund Freud, among others), which point to the Egyptian Hyksos dynasty’s Cult of Akhenaton; the seed of all the Abrahamic religions (as discussed by John Lash). Looking at world developments since that time, one could argue the root of what we call “evil” derives from same.

So going back from the gamist/gynist version of Mono to Poly, and maintaining an open mind, we have to ask ourselves is it unnatural?

According to the article from Psychology Today, appropriately entitled Ten Politically Incorrect Truths About Human Nature:

2. Humans are naturally polygamous: Polygyny (the marriage of one man to many women) is widely practiced in human societies, even though Judeo-Christian traditions hold that monogamy is the only natural form of marriage. We know that humans have been polygynous throughout most of history because men are taller than women.

Among primate and nonprimate species, the degree of polygyny highly correlates with the degree to which males of a species are larger than females. The more polygynous the species, the greater the size disparity between the sexes. Typically, human males are 10 percent taller and 20 percent heavier than females. This suggests that, throughout history, humans have been mildly polygynous.

3. Most women benefit from polygyny, while most men benefit from monogamy When there is resource inequality among men, most women benefit from polygyny: women can share a wealthy man. Under monogamy, they are stuck with marrying a poorer man. In societies where rich men are much richer than poor men, women (and their children) are better off sharing the few wealthy men; one-half, one-quarter, or even one-tenth of a wealthy man is still better than an entire poor man. As George Bernard Shaw puts it, “The maternal instinct leads a woman to prefer a tenth share in a first-rate man to the exclusive possession of a third-rate one.”

Looking at today’s world (again, keep that mind open), then Polygyny could solve some of our problems, especially those faced by the Black Community in America. Here’s an excerpt from the perspective of Sister Shahmeen (aforementioned):

I am for polygyny because I think it would benefit our black community … We have a ratio of women to men that is ridiculous; there are too many women who won’t ever have the opportunity to be a wife and have a complete family (an active mother and father taking care of the children).

Everything in creation and nature bear witness to polygyny starting from the solar system … there is one sun and 9 planets … he is the sustainer, the supplier, and the provider. All planets have life through him and have their own individual attributes (like women). That is the universal order of things. In the animal world, the fittest male gets the females, like with seals, lions, etc … living in harmony is intelligence and it is based off of order (maat) in creation, meaning everything is divinely intelligent … because it all comes from the same source (life-force).

Also, women can develop long-lasting friendships [real sisterhood] … they will share responsibilities: taking care of the home, taking care of the children, building alongside each other … Children will have a household were there is always someone there to look over them … The black community will have significantly less crime, adultery, abortion, incarceration … more stability, creativity, bonding, and success … all [together] striving for a better community.

At one point in my life, and I suspect from an ego-driven perspective, I had envisioned some future for myself in some rural South American setting with the girls I’ve loved most and all our children living together. I had dismissed that as some pipe dream, but the more I think about now, it may not necessarily have been all that absurd.

When you really start to openly consider the issue, the benefits far outweigh the negative ego-driven, programmed fear and anxiety issues that would arise (with the exception of, as the first article implied, the less prosperous males). Mainly, there would always be a mother around to nurture, influence, and entertain the children. The television as a nanny would no longer be required (and, could be done away with altogether). Homeschooling would become more feasible, thus keeping children away from the indoctrination centers (i.e., the Foundation controlled federal school system). A mother could still get free time for herself to pursue career and hobbies. The damage done to the family unit by the outgrowth of radical feminism could be reversed, while women’s rights were preserved. {*5}

Is this why the powers-that-be view polygamists as such a threat? Is that why it is illegal in all of the United States, and most westernized countries? A marriage is simply a contract between two parties. There are no laws barring multiple parties from entering contracts to engage in legal activity, except for this one case.

Then I come across this interesting note from Truther Thoughts implying a Waco-style pyre may be in the works for the polygamist families in Eldorado. As I indicated before, “El” has a synchromystic tie-in to Saturn and as Through the Looking Glass speculated, 2008 may be the year of Eli’s.The El Dorado legend speaks of a South American tribal chief who covered himself with gold dust. So, the synchromystic can-of-worms has been opened: the Saturnian Cult’s El is having a banner year (Eli Manning’s Super Bowl), monatomic gold, Stardust and the Golden Compass (as I touched on before), the festival of Baal, and even Mickey Mouse. All you synchronauts, explore!

As for Eldorado, it looks like, for now, the worst may have been averted (burning people alive to Baal today). But, you have to look at how the mainstream media is spinning the story. Note the use of loaded words like “renegade sect” (vs. “offshoot” or “branch”) and “compound” (vs. “home” or “ranch”). Highlights:

• “A local law enforcement officer was quoted as saying that authorities were not able to ‘get at’ these families earlier because they were home schooling.” [Didn't take them long to tie it to home-schooling, did it?]
• “Some fear the harsh measures in Texas will drive polygamists further into the shadows and increase their fanaticism.” ["Shadows" and "Fanaticism?"]
• “In my opinion, this is the largest endeavor we’ve ever been involved in in the state of Texas,” said Children’s Protective Services spokesman Marleigh Meisner, who said she was also involved in the 1993 siege of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco.” [Synch alert! An MM tied to El and Waco.]
• “They have no concept of mainstream society, and their mothers were born into and have no concept of mainstream culture.” [They don't post nude photos of themselves on MySpace; aren't exposed to Disney mind control.]
• “Child welfare investigator Angie Voss testified that at least five girls who are younger than 18 are pregnant or have children.” [Going to assume that Ms. Voss has never been anywhere near average American high-school?]
• “Eldorado resident Amelia Rodriguez, 60, [in reference to FLDS moving to her town] said, ‘I get kind of scared because there’s no telling what’s going to happen. I don’t like it. I don’t feel it’s a good place for them to be.’” [The uninformed opinion of this xenophobic townie is "newsworthy?"]

According to one of the mainstream sources, the mothers were appealing to Governor Rick Perry for help. Um, isn’t this the same Rick Perry who loves children so much, that he tried to make the dangerous untested Gardasil vaccine mandatory in all of Texas? I don’t think Rick cares about children, but sadly, if there’s money involved, he might be inclinded to pretend to.

How many kids were taken away? 416! [As of last count] So, CPS, an agency suspected to be heavily infiltrated by pedophiles, and paid bonuses when they take children away, is forcibly separating children from their mothers and putting them in foster care. Hopefully, they won’t get sent to Florida, where hundreds (some allege thousands) of foster care children are “unaccounted” for, and those in high positions have been caught engaging in nefarious activities. [How odd! Contains a quote from Florida DCF spokeswoman Marilyn Munoz.] What a nightmare! Why isn’t Oprah screaming her head off about this? Oh, never mind.

Now, I don’t personally know if the allegations in Eldorado are true or false, but they do seem fishy. Based on intuition, I can deduce that if all of the people were completely innocent, then they would have probably burned them in effigy to the fire-god Baal. Instead, it seems like the media will play this out to further demonize the concept of polygyny and further implant the idea that only horrible people practice it. {*6} Furthermore, don’t make the assumption these children will be in the clear if they get fostered out, because as I implied above, they could then end up in destinations unknown.

Don’t let yourself be deceived for even a moment that this case is about child welfare. Were the mainstream media even remotely concerned with children, then just ask yourself how come hardly anyone in America is familiar with the story involving Boys Town and a host of major political personalities in America:

• Conspiracy of Silence: This film is not supposed to exist
• The Franklin Cover-Up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska
• Was Jeff Gannon A Victim of the Republican Pedophile Ring?
• Franklin Case Timeline (franklincase.org)

This article was not written as a proposal that polygamy is better for everyone than monogamy. It was an exercise in whether it is another valid option for our society, and an effort to not fall for the mainstream media’s brainwashing methodology. One need only consider etymology and word origins to see the pattern. We’ve gone from Polytheism to Monotheism. From Polygamy to Monogamy. From Polyphony to Monotony.

I can’t help but wonder if this too is part and parcel of the grand scheme to turn a World of Individuals into a Hive of Automatons.

---

:: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

---

*1: I would hope there aren’t too many people around who buy the accidental theory of what happened to those poor Branch Davidians in Waco. Those unfamiliar with the real story, should probably start by watching Waco: Rules of Engagement (Part II). [LB]

*2: Other significant effigies/sacrifices to Baal on April 19th (the first day of 13 day festival honoring this ancient deity): [LB]

• 1995: 168 killed by explosions detonated inside the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City (an FBI job).
• 1993: 77 Branch Davidians burned alive by the BATF.
• 1989: 47 sailors incinerated when a gun turret explodes aboard USS Iowa.
• 1909: Joan of Arc (the consummate fire sacrifice) receives beatification from the Catholic Church.
• 1587: Sir Francis Drake sends fire ships into Cádiz harbor, burning up Spanish fleet. Drake was a Pirate (i.e., etymologically, a “Man of Fire”).

*3: How many times have you heard people say the axiom “Never discuss politics or religion at the dinner table?” [Or, "the bar."] Would you be surprised to learn the origins of the phrase trace back to Freemasonry? The phrase, specifically, is “never discuss religion or politics inside the lodge.” But, it is intended for the uninitiated or those of the lower degrees. As a couple of Freemasons have told me, “we never discuss anything but religion and politics.” Think about that next time you see someone on television parrot the phrase. Our hidden masters don’t want us discussing religion and politics, because serious conversation could lead to people discovering what a farce both of them are. [LB]

*4: In a possibly related or unrelated topic, one of my architect friends tells me that after Frank Llloyd Wright came along, the use of “golden sections” (traditions dating back thousands of years and tied to natural order and sacred geometry) went away and how CAD programs don’t even offer them. [LB]

*5: My feminist friends have already given me grief on this, and I suspect it’s cause no one ever wants to admit they’ve been had. Sorry, the entire women’s liberation movement of the 60’s/70’s was a controlled sham. Gloria Steinem was funded and took orders from the CIA. As Aaron Russo discussed, the purpose was to get women out of the homes, so that children’s minds would be influenced more by the schools, the media (and, I’d surmise, MTV brainwashed day-care workers). The most telling result? Before “the movement,” the average working man generated enough income to provide for a family of six. Now, it takes an average of two working parents, to provide for a family of four. [LB]

*6: Or, just fabricate the evidence, which may be the norm in Texas law enforcement. Some articles said police were insisting on DNA samples in Eldorado. [LB]